| |  | | | |   |  |
06-20-2008, 03:56:57 AM
|
#1 (permalink)
|  |  | | TRADER SPARKING
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 134
| What do you think of the wording of this email? I received a response to my issue from yesterday, saying that i'm allowed overage  . However the second paragraph said this: However, commissary management, in cooperation with the Installation
Commander, may restrict the number of transactions per customer. As a
matter of policy, sales restrictions limiting amount per purchase, e.g.,
limit three, may be activated by DeCA Headquarters, the Federal Food and Drug Administration, The Department of Defense, or command channels when product food alerts occur, or in instances when a sales transaction involves purchases of large quantities of a single item, or when refunds or coupon redemption involves a large amount of money. As with all types of retail establishments where the exchange of goods, services, and money is involved, DeCA store management is required to monitor activity that may be perceived as potential abuse of the commissary privilege.
Does this mean that the Customer Service Manager can turn around and say "I let you use X amount, you can't use anymore"? I know I should call the store director before my next trip, I'm just wondering what everyone else's interpertation is. |
| | |  | | |   |  |
06-20-2008, 04:18:00 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|  |  | | TRADER SPARKING
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 479
| Re: What do you think of the wording of this email? I agree with Amanda, the majority of the tone of that paragraph is just saying, "We reserve to put up a sign saying "limit 3" b/c of a national food shortage or whatever.
It does sorta seem like they are giving the manager carte blanche to limit you by the second part of the paragraph, though, but I'm guessing that if they wanted to limit you, the burden would be on them to prove that you or other military dependants in your household CAN'T use that much of a single product. I *believe* the reason that is written that way is so that they have the ability to stop GI Joe or Mrs. GI Joe from, say, buying all of the toilet paper up and then going off and reselling it-which is totally against deCa, or giving it away (which technically is against deCa policy b/c the "benefits" are only for "dependants". And they get pretty specific on this, too. Like say if Mrs. GI Joe becomes EX-Mrs. GI Joe, but there are 2 Baby GI Joe's from the marriage, EX-Mrs. GI Joe would be given ID cards for her kids ONLY and a letter stating that she is allowed to purchase items at the commissary FOR HER KIDS ONLY...so if EX-Mrs. GI Joe picks up some tampons, they can either refuse to sell them to her b/c they are obviously not for the babies or they can have her permanently removed from being able to shop the commissary for her kids b/c she broke the rules by shopping for someone who is no longer a military dependant. So, really, I think that is more where they are going with that, but honestly, if faced with that argument from a store director, I think I would bow out of buying in bulk if it truly was excessive w/out a fight.
HOWEVER, there's only so much they can limit you. One, who are they to say how much you use of a product? And two, what if you were part of a specific religious group that required that you "stock up". LDS has this policy (it's a request, but they really, really believe in it), so who are they to say that it's okay to step on your religious beliefs by not allowing you to follow your conscience about stocking up? So it's a gray area at best. |
| | |  | | |   |  |
06-20-2008, 04:12:33 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|  |  | | TRADER SPARKING
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 180
| Re: What do you think of the wording of this email? Well, my interpretation of that paragraph is that when they are reserving the right to prevent a customer from buying a large number of products, i.e. a case of K-Y, for the purpose of overage (or what they perceive to be the purpose of overage). In other words, I unfortunately think that the days of overage for large numbers of products will be over soon. I am not saying that I think that is the right thing, or that I do not agree with overage for cases of products!! I do think that a customer should be able to receive overage if he or she goes to the trouble to collect and organize the coupons and find the good deal.....IF THAT IS THE STORE'S BLANKET POLICY. I am just saying that I think they will change it, especially as more attention is brought to the subject and store manager after store manager calls to complain about it, after they have been proved wrong time and time again. I really do not understand why it is such a big deal though. I mean, the manufacturer is the one that makes and distributes the coupons. and THE STORE DOES NOT PAY FOR THE SAVINGS FROM THE COUPON, THE MANUFACTURER DOES. From what I understand, if you do not receive the overage, the store does!!! So, as I posted in "Why are coupons such a problem?", I don't understand what the big deal is to the cashiers and managers. It is not like they are eating spam and ramen noodles at home because you are saving money..... |
| | |  | | |   |  |
06-26-2008, 11:00:32 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|  |  | | TRADER SPARKING
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 205
| Re: What do you think of the wording of this email? The commissary employees know that people buy in bulk sometimes to give away. When I was a cashier, we had several people come in and buy cases and bags of dog and cat food to give to the local shelter. They would even get coupons from the manuf. and use them. No one seemed to care. The commissary is still a business and sales count. I am sure if someone was to come in and by truckloads of stuff; it would raise questions, but who is to say that this person does not live 300 miles away and comes to shop only once every 3 months. Tons of people only shop every 3 months because that is how many months meds they are allowed from the base pharmacy. They travel down to the base from far distances; hit all of the stores on base and then go back home. I do think though that some of the employees are jealous but I don't think that it something that is limited to the commissary. I try to tell a person when they see me save so much that it is hard work. When I am at the register, it is the culmination of a lot of time and effort involving buying, sorting, reading, etc.... I always try to teach people that what I am doing is ethical and following the rules. I think when people understand the process, they are more apt to agree that couponing is a good thing. I work hard to match deals. It takes time away from my family. It is my way to combat higher prices and shrinking product. Do you think companies are being honest when they quietly shrink the amount of product but not the price nor the packaging?...Is that being fair? Are they taking advantage of most people's lack of attention when it comes to this? Why is okay for them to take advantage of us this way and we are frowned upon for taking advantage of the coupons they give and encourage us to redeem? To be honest, companies that put out coupons, do so to get you to buy their product. I do not feel like I am doing anything wrong, when I purchase their product using their coupon according to the wording on the coupon. And why should I feel like I am taking advantage of them when I buy 40 instead of 2. Every business major will tell you that buying in bulk will save you money in the long run. I mean, why do you think stores like Sams and Costco are so popular. These companies are filled with suited men and women with degree's from Harvard, Yale, Columbia, and any other big school you can think of, that are paid to run the numbers when it come to promoting their products. People are fools if they think that these highly paid and highly educated analysts have never considered the value of the coupon versus the AVERAGE value of the product and whether or not someone may get their product free at one point. They will never ever put themselves in financial jeopardy with a coupon. Back to the commissary, you are right, the product is only marked up enough to cover the cost of operating the store, I think 1%. You can find this information @ commissaries.com. The vendors are happy when their product sales well. This is why I say it is still a business and sales count. Sorry this is book but I work way to hard at this to not defend it. This is just my .02s.
__________________ Jackee
Little Rock AFB, Arkansas
|
| | |  |  | | | Thread Tools | | | | Display Modes | Linear Mode |
Posting Rules
| You may not post new threads You may not post replies You may not post attachments You may not edit your posts HTML code is Off | | | |