i just wanted to say ****drooooollllllll****
i just wanted to say ****drooooollllllll****
Wife & mom of 3. they call me "penny pincher"![]()
YTD totals: OOP $1812.28 ~ Savings $4058.11
Please vote to help girls with Rett Syndrome: http://www.hotcouponworld.com/forums...irls-rett.html
I would not buy this doll because it's expensive and silly. But I have no problem with other people buying it. (My LLL mentor says if a baby makes sucking noises while nursing then he/she is not latched on properly.)
This particular doll.. no because it's a little pricey. I love the concept though. Until my daughter learned to use the play bottles in the nursery at church she would put her dolls to her chest because she had never seen a bottle and well Mommie's chest was where the milk came from.
I'm a little more shocked that so many people in this thread seem to have a problem with it. I want my daughter to grow up knowing that breastfeeding is natural and beautiful. I hope that she chooses to breastfeed her children when she has them. Why wouldn't I teach her that it was the way babies are fed when she is little?
Of course she is 8 and now and "too cool" for baby dolls. lol
I completely agree with these posts. The first time I saw one of these ugly dolls it made my skin crawl. I don't see how anyone can miss the image that these dolls clearly send to our little girls. How gross! And even beyond how they look, why would anyone think it's a good idea to imply to little girls that being a brat is a good thing??!! It seriously boggles my mind. God forbid we teach our little girls about modesty and being respectful of themselves and others. I am not saying that anyone who gives their kids one of these dolls doesn't try to teach those things, but why would a kid take you seriously if on the other hand you hand them one of these dolls? Seems like a very mixed message to me.
As for the breastfeeding doll, I probably wouldn't buy one, but they don't really bother me either. My daughters always just pretended to BF their regular dolls. That is what an imagination is for. I'm too cheap to shell out the money for something like that anyway! LOL.![]()
That's my point. Men will always react on topless women, the only difference is how they'll do it: keep it in own thoughts only or let it come out in looks, words, etc.
Women should do whatever feels comfortable for them. That's includes reaction of others, men included, on her appearance and attire: she might be OK to go topless but how others look, talk and behave towards her might change her opinion on how to dress. Right or wrong, good or bad, she cannot predict nor control others.
This specific doll is expensive, promoting wrong BF technics (as was mentioned above the right latch shouldn't be noisy), has nothing left to imagination. Me personally do not think a child of dolls age would benefit from it in any way.
OK, a Cliff Claven moment here. Remember him from Cheers?
First of all, I'm not saying I believe this, because I think we always walked upright, but that's a different thread. I just want to get that out there right away.
This is the scientific explaination. I'll try to say it tactfully:
When humans were walking around on all fours, the womans bottoms were eye level. It all had to do with mating needs and availablity of seeing what was right there. When human began walking on two legs, the bottom became tucked and hidden. It was no longer round and out there. kwim? Women's breast then became eye level and had sort of the same shape as the rump. Breasts then became the attraction shaped part of the body in regards to mating that was inbred in humans minds since the beginning of time.