I'm not sure when my DS' recess is, but his lunch is at 10:25....ugh.
When I taught K up until five years ago, we were allowed two 20 minute recesses per week, and were actually discouraged from taking them unless "all classworlk was done". I left an article on the principal's desk once about how children learn MUCH better when they are allowed to be active throughout the day....nothing changed. There was no downtime allowed whatsoever - even in the morning before school, while waiting to be picked up, on the bus, and once their lunch was eaten, each child had to read silently.
We even were told to post alphabet charts on the bathroom walls so that "learning time wouldn't be lost".
Too bad no one worries about childhood being lost.


Home
LinkBack URL
About LinkBacks

. 

Reply With Quote
.
Bali-I'm sorry I kinda hijacked your thread about lunch times, but these extreme early lunch times may also be a factor in the lack of recess at some schools. Just a thought.
Proud mom to an adorable two year old little boy!
), but the whole school lunch/breakfast craptastic system is a huuge sore spot for me (I may need to get some kind of cream for that
), because they were too busy chatting with their co-workers, rather than taking dd's money and marking her selection. I don't understand why feeding children is so difficult and controversial
.
), and has no interest in food at 7:00am (I can't say as I blame her), so that's where our am arguing starts. If I just had to get her dressed and off to school 20 minutes earlier, and she was able to eat there, I'm sure she would be more than happy to snarf down some oatmeal and toast with her girls at 8:00am instead. I'm sure it would make for a much more productive day for her teachers, as they won't have a child that's cranky because she got read the riot act prior to arriving at school, and she won't be "hangry" later in the morning because her belly is full. It would be a good productive learning environment.
